|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Act IV, scenes vi–viii
Summary: Act IV, scene vi
On the field at the Battle of Agincourt, the English appear
to have seized the advantage and have captured many French soldiers
and noblemen. But the battle is not quite over, as many of the French continue
to fight. Exeter gives King Henry an update on the battle: the English
are doing well, but two noble cousins, the Duke of York and the
Earl of Suffolk, have been killed. Exeter touchingly describes the
way the wounded York lay down to die beside the body of his beloved
cousin Suffolk. Henry, like Exeter, is moved to tears by the story.
A sudden stir and cry sounds. King Henry, interpreting
this commotion as a rally by the French, abruptly orders every English
soldier to kill his French prisoners—a remarkably bloody move. Summary: Act IV, scene vii
Alexander, God knows, and you know … did in his ales and his angers, look you, kill his best friend Cleitus— Back in the press of battle, Fluellen talks with Gower.
A small group of French soldiers, fleeing the main crush of the
battle, have attacked the English camp. They have looted the goods
there and murdered the young pages, mere children, who were left
in the camp. Fluellen is outraged at the French atrocity of killing
the young pages, which violates the chivalrous codes of battle.
He agrees with Gower in approving of King Henry’s decision to slaughter
the French prisoners, and he compares the valiant Henry to Alexander
the Great.
King Henry appears, with the Duke of Bourbon as a prisoner. Having
learned about the slaughter of the boys, he says he is angrier than
he has ever been before and repeats the order to kill the French prisoners.
Montjoy, the now-humbled French messenger, reappears. He brings
a request from the king of France that the French be allowed to
go safely into the battlefield to identify, recover, and bury their
dead. King Henry demands to know whether the English won. Montjoy
says they have, and Henry praises God for the victory.
Henry spots the soldier Michael Williams, with whom he
argued and exchanged gloves the night before. Henry decides to play
a practical joke: he gives Williams’s glove to Fluellen and tells
him to wear it publicly, saying that it came from a noble Frenchman
in the field and that anyone who attacks Fluellen over it must be
a traitor to the English. Henry then follows them to see the fun. Summary: Act IV, scene viii
When Williams sees Fluellen, he recognizes his own glove
and thinks Fluellen was the man with whom he quarreled the night before.
He strikes Fluellen, and Fluellen, believing that Williams is a French
traitor, orders him to be arrested. King Henry arrives, innocently
asking about the cause of the fuss, and then he reveals to Williams
that his quarrel is really with King Henry himself. Williams says
that he cannot be held responsible for picking a quarrel with the king
because Henry was deliberately disguising his identity the preceding
night. Henry, enjoying his little joke and approving of Williams’s
courage, rewards him by filling his glove with coins.
Exeter and a herald return to report the total number
of casualties. Ten thousand French soldiers are dead, but somehow
the English have lost only twenty-nine men. Recognizing their extraordinary
good luck, the Englishmen give praise to God. Henry orders his men
to proceed to the captured village, but without any bragging. Analysis: Act IV, scenes vi–viii
The touching story of the death of the Duke of York, which
Exeter relates to Henry at the beginning of Act IV, scene vi, presents
a very romanticized view of death in battle. Both Exeter and Henry
are deeply touched by the great love between York and his cousin
Suffolk, as well as by York’s selfless courage and love for his
king. The discrepancy between York and Suffolk’s devoted friendship
and King Henry’s ill-fated friendships—with Falstaff, Scrope, and
Bardolph, for instance—highlights again the pressure of monarchy, which
prevents Henry from enjoying such an uncomplicated, loving friendship
with anyone.
The problems inherent in loving Henry are raised again
in the following scene, in the conversation between Fluellen and
Gower. Fluellen’s comparison of King Henry to Alexander the Great
is evidently meant to be very flattering, but it does not exactly
come off that way. Fluellen begins by referring to “Alexander the
Pig” (IV.vii.12–13).
Of course, he means to say “Alexander the Big”—an error for “Alexander
the Great,” as Gower promptly corrects him—but Fluellen’s Welsh
accent turns the b into a p.
Moreover, the qualities Fluellen praises in Alexander
do not necessarily seem flattering when applied to Henry. The most
telling of these comes when Fluellen mentions that Alexander, “in
his rages and his furies … did in his ales and his angers … kill
his best friend Cleitus” (IV.vii.28–32).
The parallel Fluellen has in mind is that Henry, at the same age
(twenty-eight) Alexander was when he killed Cleitus, “turned away
the fat knight with the great-belly doublet” (IV.vii.40).
Gower supplies the knight’s name: Sir John Falstaff. This memory
does not seem to diminish Henry in Fluellen’s eyes, but it may not
sit as comfortably with the audience. Shakespeare continually reminds
us that the nature of kingship is such that being a good king may
keep one from being a likable man.
The discrepancy revealed in the numbers of the French
and the English dead (10,000 versus
twenty-nine) may seem almost impossible to believe. Nonetheless,
these seem to be the real numbers for the historical battle of Agincourt—at
least, they are the numbers recorded for the Battle of Agincourt
in Shakespeare’s historical source, the Chronicles of Raphael Holinshed.
One cause of the high French mortality rate is that the French army
lost its organization, and many of the French soldiers broke and
ran. In flight, they were easy targets and couldn’t fight back very
well. It had rained very heavily prior to the battle, putting the
French, with their heavy armor and horses, at a disadvantage. But
probably the most important cause of the lopsided victory was the
English use of the longbow, a weapon that had existed for hundreds
of years but whose use had been forgotten on the continent until
the English brought it to Agincourt. Shakespeare, however, does
not attribute the outcome of the battle to tactics, weather, or
technology, preferring to depict Henry’s victory as an act of God. |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Contact Us | Privacy Policy | Terms and Conditions | About
©2006 SparkNotes LLC, All Rights Reserved.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||