Buchanan accepts Lecompton ConstitutionSupreme Court issues Dred Scott v. Sanford decisionPanic of 1857
Congress rejects Lecompton ConstitutionLincoln and Douglas debate slavery in Illinois
15th U.S. president; supported the Lecompton Constitution to admit Kansas as a slave state
Slave who sued his master for his and his family’s freedom in a landmark 1857 Supreme Court case
Chief Justice of the Supreme Court who declared the Missouri Compromise unconstitutional in the Dred Scott v. Sanford decision
Illinois senator who rejected Kansas’s Lecompton Constitution; announced Freeport Doctrine of popular sovereignty during the Lincoln-Douglas debates in 1858
Former lawyer from Illinois who rose to national prominence during the Lincoln-Douglas debates
Just two days after James Buchanan became president in 1857, controversy over the slavery issue struck again when the Supreme Court declared the Missouri Compromise unconstitutional in the Dred Scott v. Sanford case. In the infamous decision, the enslaved Dred Scott sued his master for his freedom and that of his wife and daughter. Scott had married a free black woman while traveling with his master in the free state of Illinois in the 1830s. The two had a child but then moved back to the South. Scott believed that he had been freed once he had crossed the 36˚ 30' parallel and that his wife and daughter had been enslaved illegally when they returned to the South.
However, Chief Justice Roger Taney, along with a majority of the other justices—all but one from the South—ruled that the Missouri Compromise was unconstitutional because the federal government had no right to restrict the movement of property (i.e., slaves). Taney also contended that Scott had no business suing his master in a U.S. court, because that right was reserved only for citizens. Taney hoped his ruling would finalize blacks’ status as property, uphold slavery, and end the divisive sectional debates.
The Dred Scott ruling only exacerbated sectional tensions, however. Whereas Southerners hailed it as a landmark decision that would finally bring peace, Northerners were appalled. Thousands in the North took to the streets to protest the decision, and many questioned the impartiality of the Southern-dominated Supreme Court. Several state legislatures essentially nullified the decision and declared that they would never permit slavery within their borders, no matter who ordered them to do so. Buchanan himself was implicated when it was discovered that he had pressured the Northern justice into voting with the Southerners. Arguably, the Dred Scott decision had almost as great an effect on Northern public opinion as Uncle Tom’s Cabin.
Meanwhile, the bleeding had not stopped in Kansas, where abolitionist settlers and border ruffians, unable to agree on a territorial government, established two separate ones—a Free-Soil legislature in Topeka and a proslavery legislature in Lecompton. After the Free-Soilers boycotted a rigged election to draft a state constitution in 1857, proslavery settlers were given a free hand to write the document as they sought fit. When they finished this Lecompton Constitution, they then applied for statehood as a slave state.
President Buchanan accepted the constitution immediately and welcomed Kansas into the Union. In 1858, however, the Republican-dominated Congress refused to admit Kansas on the grounds that border ruffians had rigged the election. Stephen Douglas declared that Kansas would be admitted only after honest elections were held to determine whether the state would be free or slave. The Lecompton Constitution was put to a special vote in the territory the following year and was soundly defeated. Kansas eventually entered the Union as a free state in 1861.
Buchanan’s other major challenge was the brief economic depression that swept the nation in 1857 and 1858. The depression was sparked by the Panic of 1857, which occurred when newspapers reported the failure of a prominent bank in the Midwest. Reduced exports of food and manufactured goods made the depression worse in the West and North but left the South’s cotton economy relatively untouched. Southerners relished Britain’s dependence on cotton and hailed the soaring unemployment rate in the North as proof that the wage-labor system had failed.