Summary
After the Declaration of Independence was
adopted, the citizens of the thirteen states of the new United States of America
began the process of creating state governments, even as the states battled for
their lives in the fighting of Revolutionary
War. These governments varied
widely in their framework, some drawing more upon the traditions established
during the colonial period and some drawing more upon the rising tide of
Revolution era radical democratic republican ideology. The signs of traditional
influences included bicameral legislatures with an upper and lower house,
property requirements for voters, the notion that representatives should
exercise independent judgment rather than directly respond to popular
sentiments, and the equal division of legislative seats between towns and
counties without regard for population. The framing of new state governments
reflected the tension between these traditions and the more radical ideology of
the revolution.
The process of forming state governments reflected the political identity crisis
of the new nation. Eleven of thirteen state constitutions maintained bicameral
legislatures. In further adherence to tradition, in most states, the majority
of political officials were appointed rather than elected. However, nine of
thirteen states reduced property requirements for voting in a show of
democratically leaning ideology, but no states fully abolished them. British
government had held a constitution to be a body of unwritten customs and
practices. State constitutions varied from traditional British constitutions in
that they were written documents which were ratified by the people and could be
amended by popular vote. These documents clearly enumerated the powers granted
and denied to the government. Also, by 1784, every state constitution contained
a bill of rights that outlined the civil rights and freedoms accorded citizens.
The trend toward less powerful executive branches and more responsive
legislatures emerged clearly throughout the states. The powers of the executive
office of the governor were drastically limited by every state constitution.
The governor became an elected official and elections were held annually in
every state but South Carolina, where they were biannual. Governors had very
few powers of appointment and were left only to make some financial decisions
and control the militia. Pennsylvania abolished governors altogether. State
constitutions also made the legislature more responsive to public feelings and
opinions. Of the constitutions written before 1780, eight had both chambers
elected by popular vote, one had an electoral college elect the upper chamber,
two had the lower house choose the members of the upper house, and two more,
Pennsylvania and Georgia, created popularly elected unicameral legislatures.
Other changes wrought by the state constitutions included an increase in social
equality and the disestablishment of state religions. Between 1776 and 1780,
for instance, Thomas Jefferson drafted a series of bills that broke down the
legal reinforcements for division by wealth. Virginia ended the practice of
primogeniture, which required the eldest son of a family to inherit all of a
family's land in the absence of a will, and took other steps to prevent the rise
of a ruling aristocracy. The years of the American Revolution also saw the end
of state-established religious organizations in many states, seen as detrimental
to democratic government.
The reforms instituted by state constitutions were met with a combination of
acceptance and resistance. While the radical thinking of the revolution
informed many of the decisions of the framers of state government, as time went
by a conservative backlash rose and challenged the new ideals. In
Massachusetts, the constitution was revised in 1780 to place more emphasis on
wealth, and Pennsylvania and Georgia eventually recreated upper legislative
houses. Initiatives to foster equality met with resistance in many areas of the
new nation from individuals and groups such as the Society of Cincinnati,
which saw the values of heredity and aristocratic privilege to be in their best
interests.
For political leaders of most states, the traditions of British and colonial
governments exerted a strong pull, both for reasons of habit and because of the
fact that the new governments required some system upon which to base their
structure. The tradition of bicameral legislatures stemmed from the House of
Lords and House of Commons in British Parliament, which in turn had given way to
the common practice of colonial assemblies paired with higher bodies appointed
by the colonies' royal governors or the lower assemblies themselves. This
tradition claiming that commoners and aristocrats should be represented by
separate bodies represented a powerful ideal, which, try as they might,
the supporters of radical change could not break down in most states. The
principle of property requirements for voters had its root in a more logical
argument (to say nothing of its validity), which stated that if tenant farmers
and poor hired laborers were allowed to vote, they might sell their votes to the
highest bidder or be pressured to vote as their landlord dictated. Most
political leaders recognized the basic flaws in this argument and advocated some
extension of the franchise of voting, but only small gains were made in this
area.
