|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Act I, scenes iii–v
Summary: Act I, scene iii
Lear is spending the first portion of his retirement at
Goneril’s castle. Goneril complains to her steward, Oswald, that
Lear’s knights are becoming “riotous” and that Lear himself is an
obnoxious guest (I.iii.6). Seeking to provoke
a confrontation, she orders her servants to behave rudely toward
Lear and his attendants. Summary: Act I, scene iv
Disguised as a simple peasant, Kent appears in Goneril’s
castle, calling himself Caius. He puts himself in Lear’s way, and
after an exchange of words in which Caius emphasizes his plainspokenness and
honesty, Lear accepts him into service.
Lear’s servants and knights notice that Goneril’s servants
no longer obey their commands. When Lear asks Oswald where Goneril
is, Oswald rudely leaves the room without replying. Oswald soon
returns, but his disrespectful replies to Lear’s questions induce Lear
to strike him. Kent steps in to aid Lear and trips Oswald.
The Fool arrives and, in a series of puns and double entendres, tells
Lear that he has made a great mistake in handing over his power
to Goneril and Regan. After a long delay, Goneril herself arrives
to speak with Lear. She tells him that his servants and knights have
been so disorderly that he will have to send some of them away whether
he likes it or not.
Lear is shocked at Goneril’s treasonous betrayal. Nonetheless, Goneril
remains adamant in her demand that Lear send away half of his one
hundred knights. An enraged Lear repents ever handing his power
over to Goneril. He curses his daughter, calling on Nature to make
her childless. Surprised by his own tears, he calls for his horses.
He declares that he will stay with Regan, whom he believes will
be a true daughter and give him the respect that he deserves. When
Lear has gone, Goneril argues with her husband, Albany, who is upset
with the harsh way she has treated Lear. She says that she has written
a letter to her sister Regan, who is likewise determined not to
house Lear’s hundred knights. Summary: Act I, scene v
Lear sends Kent to deliver a message to Gloucester.
The Fool needles Lear further about his bad decisions, foreseeing
that Regan will treat Lear no better than Goneril did. Lear calls
on heaven to keep him from going mad. Lear and his attendants leave
for Regan’s castle. Analysis: Act I, scenes iii–v
In these scenes, the tragedy of the play begins to unfold.
It is now becoming clear to everyone that Lear has made a mistake
in handing over his power to Goneril and Regan. Lear’s major error
is that, in stepping down from the throne, he has also given up
all of his formal authority to those who do not actually love him.
He no longer has the power to command anyone to do anything, even
to give him shelter or food—his daughters, each of whom is now a
queen over half of Britain, wield special authority over him.
Goneril and, as we soon discover, Regan enjoy
being in power and conspire to destroy Lear’s remaining influence.
Their plan to whittle down Lear’s retinue from a hundred knights
to fifty may not seem devious, but they will soon purge his knights
altogether. This gradual diminishment of Lear’s attendants symbolizes
the gradual elimination of his remaining power. Knights and servants
are part of the pomp that surrounds a powerful king, and Lear rightly
sees his loss of them as representative of his daughter’s declining
respect for his rank.
Goneril, of course, says that the reason she demands this
reduction is that the knights have been loud and destructive in
her castle—they are, she claims, “men so disordered, so deboshed
and bold” (I.iv.217). To be fair, it is difficult
for us, as readers, to know how true this assertion is. Lear claims,
“My train are men of choice and rarest parts, / That all particulars
of duty know,” yet we have already seen Lear make imperious demands
and lose his temper in a seemingly unjustified way (I.iv.240–241).
At this point in the play, the audience may still be unsure about
whether or not to sympathize with Lear, especially given his capricious
decision to banish Cordelia. Still, we know that Goneril has been
talking, in private, about how best to control her aging father.
Lear seems to begin to question his own identity. When
he realizes that Goneril plans to frustrate his desires, he asks,
“Doth any here know me? This is not Lear. / . . . / Who is it that
can tell me who I am?” (I.iv.201–205). It
is as if Goneril’s insistence that Lear is now senile makes Lear
himself wonder whether he is really himself anymore or whether he
has lost his mind. Driven to despair at the end of Act I, scene
v, he says, “O let me not be mad, not mad, sweet heaven!”—a foreshadowing
of his eventual insanity (I.v.38).
In Act I, scene iv, we meet Lear’s Fool. Many
of Shakespeare’s plays feature a clown of some sort, and King
Lear arguably has two such clowns: the Fool himself and
Edgar in his later disguise as Tom O’Bedlam. Many kings and queens
during the Renaissance had court fools to amuse them. However, in
addition to wearing funny costumes, singing, performing acrobatic
tricks, and juggling, fools also made puns and rude jokes and offered
their take on matters to their sovereigns.
Lear’s Fool cleverly combines this sort of foolishness
with a deeper wisdom. The license, traditionally granted to official “fools,”
to say things to their superiors that anybody else would be punished
for enables him to counsel Lear, even though he seems only to prattle
nonsensically. Moreover, Lear seems to have a very close relationship
with his Fool: the Fool calls Lear “nuncle” and Lear calls the Fool
“boy.” He is always speaking in riddles and songs, but in these
scenes his meaning can be understood: he advises Lear to be wary
of his daughters. In telling Lear, “I / am better than thou art now;
I am a fool, thou art nothing,” he hints at the dangerous situation
in which Lear has put himself (I.iv.168–169).
His ostensibly silly singing—“The hedge-sparrow fed the cuckoo so
long / That it had it head bit off by it young”—clearly warns the
king that his daughters, each like a traitorous “cuckoo,” plan to
turn against the father who raised them (I.iv.190–191). Act II, scenes i–ii
Note: Many editions of King Lear, including The Norton Shakespeare,
divide Act II into four scenes. Other editions divide Act II into
only two scenes.
Summary: Act II, scene i
In Gloucester’s castle, Gloucester’s servant Curan tells
Edmund that he has informed Gloucester that the duke of Cornwall
and his wife, Regan, are coming to the castle that very night. Curan
also mentions vague rumors about trouble brewing between the duke
of Cornwall and the duke of Albany.
Edmund is delighted to hear of Cornwall’s visit, realizing
that he can make use of him in his scheme to get rid of Edgar. Edmund
calls Edgar out of his hiding place and tells him that Cornwall
is angry with him for being on Albany’s side of their disagreement.
Edgar has no idea what Edmund is talking about. Edmund tells Edgar
further that Gloucester has discovered his hiding place and that
he ought to flee the house immediately under cover of night. When
he hears Gloucester coming, Edmund draws his sword and pretends
to fight with Edgar, while Edgar runs away. Edmund cuts his arm
with his sword and lies to Gloucester, telling him that Edgar wanted
him to join in a plot against Gloucester’s life and that Edgar tried
to kill him for refusing. The unhappy Gloucester praises Edmund
and vows to pursue Edgar, sending men out to search for him.
Cornwall and Regan arrive at Gloucester’s house.
They believe Edmund’s lies about Edgar, and Regan asks if Edgar
is one of the disorderly knights that attend Lear. Edmund replies
that he is, and Regan speculates further that these knights put
Edgar up to the idea of killing Gloucester in order to acquire Gloucester’s
wealth. Regan then asks Gloucester for his advice in answering letters
from Lear and Goneril. Summary: Act II, scene ii
Outside Gloucester’s castle, Kent, still in peasant disguise,
meets Oswald, the chief steward of Goneril’s household. Oswald doesn’t recognize
Kent from their scuffle in Act I, scene iv. Kent roundly abuses
Oswald, describing him as cowardly, vain, boastful, overdressed,
servile, and groveling. Oswald still maintains that he doesn’t know
Kent; Kent draws his sword and attacks him.
Oswald’s cries for help bring Cornwall, Regan,
and Gloucester. Kent replies rudely to their calls for explanation,
and Cornwall orders him to be punished in the stocks, a wooden device
that shackles a person’s ankles and renders them immobile. Gloucester
objects that this humiliating punishment of Lear’s messenger will
be seen as disrespectful of Lear himself and that the former king
will take offense. But Cornwall and Regan maintain that Kent deserves
this treatment for assaulting Goneril’s servant, and they put him
in the stocks.
After everyone leaves, Kent reads a letter that he has
received from Cordelia in which she promises that she will find
some way, from her current position in France, to help improve conditions
in Britain. The unhappy and resigned Kent dozes off in the stocks. Analysis: Act II, scenes i–ii
Edmund’s clever scheming to get rid of Edgar shows his
cunning and his immorality. His ability to manipulate people calls
to mind arguably the greatest of Shakespeare’s villains, Iago, from Othello, who demonstrates
a similar capacity for twisting others to serve his own ends. There
is a great deal of irony in Edmund’s description to his father of
the ways in which Edgar has allegedly schemed against Gloucester’s
life. Edmund goes so far as to state that Edgar told him that no
one would ever believe Edmund’s word against his because of Edmund’s
illegitimate birth. With this remark, Edmund not only calls attention
to his bastard status—which is clearly central to his resentful,
ambitious approach to life—but proves crafty enough to use it to
his advantage.
Gloucester’s rejection of Edgar parallels Lear’s rejection
of Cordelia in Act I, scene i, and reminds us of the similarities
between the two unhappy families: Edgar and Cordelia are good children
of fathers who reject them in favor of children who do not love
them. When Gloucester says, “I never got him”—that is, he never
begot, or fathered, him—he seems to be denying that he is actually
Edgar’s father, just as Lear has disowned Cordelia (II.i.79).
On the other hand, when he praises Edmund as a “loyal and natural
boy,” he seems to be acknowledging him as a true son (II.i.85).
It is somewhat difficult to know what to make of Kent’s
attack on Oswald. Oswald’s eagerness to serve the treacherous Goneril
in Act I, scene iv, has established him as one of the play’s minor
villains, but Kent’s barrage of insults and subsequent physical
attack on Oswald are clearly unprovoked. Oswald’s failure to fight
back may be interpreted as cowardice, but one can also interpret
it as Oswald does: he says that he chooses not to attack Kent because
of Kent’s “gray beard”—at nearly fifty, Kent is an old man and thus
no longer suited for fighting (II.ii.55).
Kent’s attack seems to be rooted in his anger at Goneril’s treatment
of Lear—“anger hath a privilege” is the excuse that he gives Cornwall
and Regan—and his rage at the hypocrisy surrounding Lear’s betrayal
by his daughters (II.ii.62).
Cornwall and Regan’s decision to put Kent in the stocks
reinforces what we have already seen of their disrespect for their
father. The stocks were a punishment used on common criminals, and
their use on Lear’s serving man could easily be interpreted as highly
disrespectful to Lear’s royal status. Gloucester announces as much when
he protests, “Your purposed low correction / Is such as basest and
contemned’st wretches / . . . / Are punished with” (II.ii.134–137).
Regan, however, ignores his pleas; she almost seems to welcome the
idea of inviting Lear’s anger. |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Contact Us | Privacy Policy | Terms and Conditions | About
©2006 SparkNotes LLC, All Rights Reserved.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||