|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Act III, scenes i–iii
Summary: Act III, scene i
A storm rages on the heath. Kent, seeking Lear
in vain, runs into one of Lear’s knights and learns that Lear is
somewhere in the area, accompanied only by his Fool. Kent gives
the knight secret information: he has heard that there is unrest
between Albany and Cornwall and that there are spies for the French
in the English courts. Kent tells the knight to go to Dover, the
city in England nearest to France, where he may find friends who
will help Lear’s cause. He gives the knight a ring and orders him
to give it to Cordelia, who will know who has sent the knight when she
sees the ring. Kent leaves to search for Lear. Summary: Act III, scene ii
Meanwhile, Lear wanders around in the storm, cursing the
weather and challenging it to do its worst against him. He seems
slightly irrational, his thoughts wandering from idea to idea but
always returning to fixate on his two cruel daughters. The Fool,
who accompanies him, urges him to humble himself before his daughters
and seek shelter indoors, but Lear ignores him. Kent finds the two
of them and urges them to take shelter inside a nearby hovel. Lear
finally agrees and follows Kent toward the hovel. The Fool makes
a strange and confusing prophecy. Summary: Act III, scene iii
Inside his castle, a worried Gloucester speaks with Edmund.
The loyal Gloucester recounts how he became uncomfortable when Regan,
Goneril, and Cornwall shut Lear out in the storm. But when he urged
them to give him permission to go out and help Lear, they became
angry, took possession of his castle, and ordered him never to speak
to Lear or plead on his behalf.
Gloucester tells Edmund that he has received news of a
conflict between Albany and Cornwall. He also informs him that a
French army is invading and that part of it has already landed in
England. Gloucester feels that he must take Lear’s side
and now plans to go seek him out in the storm. He tells Edmund that
there is a letter with news of the French army locked in his room,
and he asks his son to go and distract the duke of Cornwall while
he, Gloucester, goes onto the heath to search for Lear. He adds
that it is imperative that Cornwall not notice his absence; otherwise,
Gloucester might die for his treachery.
When Gloucester leaves, Edmund privately rejoices at the
opportunity that has presented itself. He plans to betray his father
immediately, going to Cornwall to tell him about both Gloucester’s
plans to help Lear and the location of the traitorous letter from
the French. Edmund expects to inherit his father’s title, land,
and fortune as soon as Gloucester is put to death. Analysis: Act III, scenes i–iii
The information that Kent gives the knight brings the
audience out of the personal realm of Lear’s anguish and into the
political world of Lear’s Britain. Throughout the play, we hear
rumors of conflict between Albany and Cornwall and of possible war
with France, but what exactly transpires at any specific moment
is rarely clear. The question of the French is not definitively
resolved until Act IV. Kent’s mention of Dover, however, provides
a clue: Dover is a port city in the south of England where ships
from France often landed; it is famous for its high white cliffs.
As various characters begin moving southward toward Dover in the
scenes that follow, the tension of an inevitable conflict heightens.
Whatever the particulars of the political struggle, however, it
is clear that Lear, by giving away his power in Britain to Goneril
and Regan—and eventually Edmund—has destroyed not only his own authority
but all authority. Instead of a stable, hierarchical
kingdom with Lear in control, chaos has overtaken the realm, and
the country is at the mercy of the play’s villains, who care for
nothing but their own power.
This political chaos is mirrored in the natural
world. We find Lear and his courtiers plodding across a deserted
heath with winds howling around them and rain drenching them. Lear,
like the other characters, is unused to such harsh conditions, and
he soon finds himself symbolically stripped bare. He has already
discovered that his cruel daughters can victimize him; now he learns
that a king caught in a storm is as much subject to the power of
nature as any man.
The importance of the storm, and its symbolic connection
to the state of mind of the people caught in it, is first suggested
by the knight’s words to Kent. Kent asks the knight, “Who’s there,
besides foul weather?”; the knight answers, “One minded like the
weather, most unquietly”(III.i.1–2). Here
the knight’s state of mind is shown to be as turbulent as the winds
and clouds surrounding him. This is true of Lear as well: when Kent
asks the knight where the king is, the knight replies, “Contending
with the fretful elements; / . . . / Strives in his little world
of man to out-scorn / The to-and-fro-conflicting wind and rain”
(III.i.4–11). Shakespeare’s use of pathetic
fallacy—a literary device in which inanimate objects such as nature
assume human reactions—amplifies the tension of the characters’
struggles by elevating human forces to the level of natural forces.
Lear is trying to face down the powers of nature,
an attempt that seems to indicate both his despair and his increasingly
confused sense of reality. Both of these strains appear in Lear’s
famous speech to the storm, in which he commands, “Blow, winds,
and crack your cheeks! rage! blow! / You cataracts and hurricanoes,
spout / Till you have drenched our steeples, drowned the cocks!”
(III.ii.1–3). Lear’s attempt to speak to
the storm suggests that he has lost touch with the natural world
and his relation to it—or, at least, that he has lost touch
with the ordinary human understanding of nature. In a sense, though,
his diatribe against the weather embodies one of the central questions
posed by King Lear: namely, whether the universe
is fundamentally friendly or hostile to man. Lear asks whether nature
and the gods are actually good, and, if so, how life can have treated
him so badly.
The storm marks one of the first appearances of the apocalyptic imagery
that is so important in King Lear and that will
become increasingly dominant as the play progresses. The chaos reflects
the disorder in Lear’s increasingly crazed mind, and the apocalyptic
language represents the projection of Lear’s rage and despair onto
the outside world: if his world has come to a symbolic end because
his daughters have stripped away his power and betrayed him, then,
he seems to think, the real world ought to end too. As we have seen,
the chaos in nature also reflects the very real political chaos
that has engulfed Britain in the absence of Lear’s authority.
Along with Lear’s increasing despair and projection, we
also see his understandable fixation on his daughters: “Nor rain,
wind, thunder, fire, are my daughters: / I tax you not,
you elements, with unkindness” (III.ii.14–15).
Lear tells the thunder that he does not blame it for attacking him
because it does not owe him anything. But he does blame his “two
pernicious daughters” for their betrayal (III.ii.21). Despite
the apparent onset of insanity, Lear exhibits some degree of rational
thought—he is still able to locate the source of his misfortune.
Finally, we see strange shifts beginning to occur inside
Lear’s mind. He starts to realize that he is going mad, a terrifying
realization for anyone. Nevertheless, Lear suddenly notices his
Fool and asks him, “How dost my boy? Art cold?” (III.ii.66).
He adds, “I have one part in my heart / That’s sorry yet for thee”
(III.ii.70–71). Here, Lear takes real and
compassionate notice of another human being for the first time in
the play. This concern for others reflects the growth of Lear’s
humility, which eventually redeems him and enables him to win Cordelia’s
forgiveness. |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Contact Us | Privacy Policy | Terms and Conditions | About
©2006 SparkNotes LLC, All Rights Reserved.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||