Example: In the 1992 presidential
election, independent candidate H. Ross Perot received nearly 19 percent
of the popular vote, but he did not get a single electoral vote. Other
recent third-party candidates—including John Anderson in 1980, Perot
again in 1996, and Ralph Nader in 2000—also failed to win electoral
votes. The last third-party candidate to win any electoral votes was
George Wallace in 1968’s tumultuous election.
Proportional Representation
Many other democratic legislatures use proportional
representation instead of plurality to determine how seats are
allocated to political parties. Parties win seats in the legislature in
rough proportion to the percentage of the popular votes the party wins. A
party that receives 30 percent of the votes, for example, will get roughly
30 percent of the seats in the legislature. In multiparty systems, parties
can achieve electoral success without winning a majority, so there is less
reason to form giant parties that strive for the majority.
Advantages and Disadvantages
There are a few advantages of the American two-party system:
-
Stability: Two-party systems are more stable than
multiparty systems
-
Moderation: The two parties must appeal to the middle to
win elections, so the parties tend to be moderate.
-
Ease: Voters have only to decide between two parties.
But there are also a few disadvantages to our system, including the
following:
-
Lack of choice: Both parties tend to be very similar,
limiting voters’ options.
-
Less democratic: A percentage of people will always feel
marginalized by the system.
Realignment
Scholars use the term realignment to describe a major shift
in the political divisions within a country. Realignment marks a new change in
direction for the party that redefines what it means to be a member of that
party. It usually occurs when a new issue challenges the old party lines and
splits its members. The issue is often crosscutting: Both major
parties are split on a matter, and some Democrats find they agree with
Republicans more than other Democrats. When the issue becomes critically
important, the parties shift around the axis of the new issue, and a new party
system emerges.
Critical Elections
A critical election often indicates that a realignment
has occurred. Critical elections do not cause realignments. A critical
election is a sign, not a cause, of a realignment.