payment page
A parable is a brief, didactic story with flat characters, passed down orally from generation to generation. To what extent is The Pearl a parable? On the surface,
Yet large portions of Steinbeck’s writing are colorless and monotonous, as if he were recalling the story around a campfire. Again and again, sentences begin with “And”—an incantatory device that appears frequently in English translations of Biblical parables. There are four “And” sentences on page sixty-seven; five on sixty-four. Steinbeck also repeatedly strings together independent clauses with “and”: “Kino held the great pearl in his hand, and it was warm and alive . . .” “Kino looked into his pearl, and Juana cast her eyelashes down . . .” Steinbeck eschews the syntactical variety—gerunds, colons, long sentences interspersed with short—that we would expect from a literary artist. The flatness of his style recalls the plain, repetitive language of a parable.
More striking is the shallowness of Steinbeck’s characterizations. Frequently, when he writes about the evil doctor, the doctor is sitting in bed dribbling chocolate on his sheets. The doctor’s interactions with Kino—denying him help, then offering it when he suspects he can make money—are predictably immoral; Steinbeck does not attempt to humanize him or explain why he acts in such a consistently cruel way. The pearl buyers are interchangeable; each beady-eyed buyer denies Kino a fair deal, and Steinbeck does not make clear distinctions among their personalities. Even Kino, the protagonist, lacks a convincing inner life. Steinbeck’s shorthand for Kino’s feelings toward Juana and Coyotito—the mysterious strains of “The Song of the Family”—makes us wonder what is happening in Kino’s head, what he thinks about his wife, and how his ever-shifting thoughts affect the smallest details of his domestic interactions. Steinbeck uses the doctor, the money-lender, and Kino to show the demoralizing influence of wealth on all mankind. Like a writer of a parable, Steinbeck does not try to convince us that these characters are human beings.
By blending conventions of the novella and the parable, Steinbeck writes a eighty-seven-page lecture on the evils of material wealth. The length and lyrical descriptions lead us to anticipate a novella, complete with the subtlety and psychological insight associated with that genre. On the other hand, the simple characters and oral quality of the writing lead us to anticipate a parable, with the force and concision associated with that genre. The awkward combination of literary styles in The Pearl may account for its poor reception among many critics, some of whom have argued that Steinbeck writing declined significantly after
