“A
writer of story-books! What kind of a business in life,—what mode
of glorifying God, or being serviceable to mankind in his day and
generation,—may that be? Why, the degenerate fellow might as well
have been a fiddler!” Such are the compliments bandied between my
great-grandsires and myself, across the gulf of time! And yet, let
them scorn me as they will, strong traits of their nature have intertwined themselves
with mine.
This passage comes from the introductory section of The Scarlet Letter, in which the narrator details how he decided to write his version of Hester Prynne’s story. Part of his interest in the story is personal—he is descended from the original Puritan settlers of Massachusetts. Like Hester, the narrator both affirms and resists Puritan values. He is driven to write, yet the Puritan in him sees the frivolity in such an endeavor: what good, after all, can come of writing this story? Yet in that very question lies the significance of this tale, which interrogates the conflict between individual impulses and systematized social codes. The narrator finds Hester Prynne compelling because she represents America’s past, but also because her experiences reflect his own dilemmas. Thus, for the narrator, the act of writing about Hester becomes not a trivial activity but a means of understanding himself and his social context.
