Suggestions
Use up and down arrows to review and enter to select.Please wait while we process your payment
If you don't see it, please check your spam folder. Sometimes it can end up there.
If you don't see it, please check your spam folder. Sometimes it can end up there.
Please wait while we process your payment
By signing up you agree to our terms and privacy policy.
Don’t have an account? Subscribe now
Create Your Account
Sign up for your FREE 7-day trial
Already have an account? Log in
Your Email
Choose Your Plan
Save over 50% with a SparkNotes PLUS Annual Plan!
Purchasing SparkNotes PLUS for a group?
Get Annual Plans at a discount when you buy 2 or more!
Price
$24.99 $18.74 /subscription + tax
Subtotal $37.48 + tax
Save 25% on 2-49 accounts
Save 30% on 50-99 accounts
Want 100 or more? Contact us for a customized plan.
Your Plan
Payment Details
Payment Summary
SparkNotes Plus
You'll be billed after your free trial ends.
7-Day Free Trial
Not Applicable
Renews February 14, 2023 February 7, 2023
Discounts (applied to next billing)
DUE NOW
US $0.00
SNPLUSROCKS20 | 20% Discount
This is not a valid promo code.
Discount Code (one code per order)
SparkNotes Plus subscription is $4.99/month or $24.99/year as selected above. The free trial period is the first 7 days of your subscription. TO CANCEL YOUR SUBSCRIPTION AND AVOID BEING CHARGED, YOU MUST CANCEL BEFORE THE END OF THE FREE TRIAL PERIOD. You may cancel your subscription on your Subscription and Billing page or contact Customer Support at custserv@bn.com. Your subscription will continue automatically once the free trial period is over. Free trial is available to new customers only.
Choose Your Plan
Payment Details
Payment Summary
For the next 7 days, you'll have access to awesome PLUS stuff like AP English test prep, No Fear Shakespeare translations and audio, a note-taking tool, personalized dashboard, & much more!
You’ve successfully purchased a group discount. Your group members can use the joining link below to redeem their group membership. You'll also receive an email with the link.
Members will be prompted to log in or create an account to redeem their group membership.
Thanks for creating a SparkNotes account! Continue to start your free trial.
Please wait while we process your payment
Your PLUS subscription has expired
Please wait while we process your payment
Please wait while we process your payment
Chapter 11 begins Part Three of Missoula, “Unwanted Attention.” Krakauer recounts the escalating concern over rape in early 2012. Beau Donaldson’s arrest is a front-page story in the Missoulian on January 7. The next week, another story appears about an unnamed woman who, after possibly being drugged, was raped while unconscious in the snow outside her dormitory the previous year. At the end of January 2012, a private investigation into rape requested by the university concludes that the university is failing and that reports of rape on the UM campus require immediate action. Next, Krakauer describes how, on the same day in early February, a student who is a Saudi national lured two females to his room separately. The student tries to rape the first woman and does rape the second. Perhaps because the University of Montana doesn’t immediately notify the police, the student is able to flee the country. The community is outraged. UM president Royce Engstrom claims the university has an obligation to protect rape victims by not giving their names to police, but the law on the matter, Krakauer writes, is confusing. The mandate from the Dear Colleague Letter that universities take “immediate steps to investigate rape” is vague.
Next, in March 2012, the local media breaks the story that UM quarterback Jordan Johnson has been served with a restraining order for the alleged sexual assault of Cecilia Washburn. Krakauer goes back to describe what took place. Johnson and Washburn have an extended flirtatious friendship. They start texting a lot in early 2012, and on the night of February 3, Washburn tells Johnson in front of Johnson’s friend, “Jordy, I would do you anytime.” The next night Johnson and Washburn get together to watch a movie in Washburn’s room. They begin kissing, but Washburn says she doesn’t want to have sex that night. Eventually, Johnson sits on top of her. She tells him “no.” He pins her down despite her struggles and protests. He tells her to turn over, penetrates her without a condom, and says that she wanted it. She texts her friend saying she thinks she might have been raped. She wants Johnson out of her house, and drives him home. On the way out, her roommate notices she is crying.
After waking up in her room on February 5, Cecilia Washburn’s talks to a friend who comes and takes her to the clinic. She has a rape kit collected. She decides to report the rape to the University of Montana but not the police. A week later, Jordan Johnson is notified by mail that he is under investigation for violating the UM Student Conduct Code section that prohibits rape. His roommate drives him from their house to their coach, Robin Pflugard’s, house. Johnson tells Coach Pflugard about the investigation, saying that the sex was consensual. After Johnson leaves, Pflugard calls athletic director Jim O’Day and the athletic department mobilizes to defend Johnson against the allegation.
In early March, Washburn sees Johnson across campus and has symptoms of a panic attack. That’s when she files for a restraining order against Johnson. Coach Pflugard continues to let Johnson practice with the football team. He tells reporter Gwen Florio how glad the team is that Johnson is there with them on the field. Washburn’s lawyer, Josh Van de Wetering, writes UM president Royce Engstrom. Van de Wetering feels Coach Pflugard doesn’t understand the seriousness of the allegations against Johnson. Engstrom responds by firing Coach Pflugard and Athletic Director Jim O’Day. At the end of March, the football team posts an open letter on an online forum in which they lament losing their coach. Krakauer points out that the letter acknowledges the impact rape allegations are having on the football program, but lacks any expression of concern for victims. On May 1, the U.S. Department of Justice announces it is conducting a federal investigation into the way the University of Montana, the Missoula Police Department, and the County Attorney’s Office are handing sexual assault cases in Missoula.
The title of Part Three, “Unwanted Attention,” has several applications. First, it refers to the unwanted attention women receive from aggressive men. It also refers to the attention rapists in Missoula begin to be paid by law enforcement, and, finally, it refers to the unwanted attention the university, law enforcement, and prosecutors begin to receive from the media and from federal investigations. As a work of investigative journalism, Missoula is constantly taking stock of and evaluating the role journalism plays in bringing attention to the underreporting and mishandling of rape cases in Missoula. One of its arguments is that media attention has a snowball effect. With each breaking story, victims gain confidence and persuasive leverage. Though repeated rape headlines may, in the short term, contribute to a feeling of panic and frenzy, Krakauer argues that journalistic examinations by writers like Gwen Florio are ultimately a good thing. With this argument, Krakauer also justifies his own journalistic project.
In Chapter 11, Krakauer examines how the University of Montana reports rape to law enforcement. He argues that the University of Montana and universities in general are in a difficult position when it comes to reporting rape. Universities want to respect victims’ rights to privacy—some victims may not want their cases taken to law enforcement at all. But a university also has a duty to ensure that rapists are removed from campus and students are protected. Initial media reports and public opinion blame the University of Montana for inadvertently allowing a foreign exchange student who committed rape to escape the United States. From a few years’ remove, Krakauer is more forgiving of the way the University handled the situation. He argues that a standardized rape response protocol might help resolve future difficulties, but that both the protocol in place and the laws applying to the University of Montana at the time were unclear.
Please wait while we process your payment